MESOTHELIOMA

One month after the first legislation to prohibit asbestos was passed by the senate, the agents of the Public health and the government which the regulators speak outside against the invoice this they in the past supported.

The agents of the Public health voted supposedly in support of the invoice because she claimed a total ban of asbestos; however, much discover now that the watered-down proposal to alleviate intrigants.

Minor details left out of �prohibition�

According to those which in the past supported prohibition, between hearing in June and the voice by the senate right last month, the legislation was changed please with the intrigants and industry.

Many products containing asbestos are not covered by prohibition as in the beginning not indicated.

SEN. Patty Murray says that prohibition is a �step ahead� though she thinks that it should cover all the asbestos contain-products, not simply some.

I would have a prohibition of 100 percent,� Murray indicates.

EPA writes the letter

In a letter which was prepared by the EPA for the Committee of Room of energy and the trade, the agency tackled the question of the community of public health of health as a whole.

To protect the public health and the environment against risks from asbestos, prohibition should aim all the products in which asbestos is intentionally added or knowingly present like contaminant,� stated the letter.

However, last month, the office of the White House of management and the budget rejected the letter and indicated to the EPA that they could not send it to the Committee of Room, that many believed scientists of government were another example to place the policy above the importance of science.

(Source: Post of Seattle)

Do you suspectez yourselves to be exposed to the asbestos cancer? Come into contact with the processing centers of mesothelioma to discover more about asbestos and to better become with the current on the risk to develop the cancer of mesothelioma.